Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherry7
In discussing quality and content a camera that shoot something in a new way should be of interest.
|
The quality of the camera has little to do with the quality of the porn. If it's judged on the quality of the camera I might well lose. Will try to loan better kit, but who knows.
I've never known anyone jerk off to a porn scene
because it was crystal sharp and clear. In fact many surfers prefer amateur shot content because it's real. That's the problem with so much porn today, the models are on auto pilot, do a bad fake scene and they all start to look like each other.
This isn't just Manwin sites, it's the vast majority of sites. If one site gets an idea it then repeats it over and over and over again 50 to 500 times and soon the viewer gets bored with seeing the same scene played out the same way over and over with the only thing changing is the girls face. Pussies all look very similar and if a film is to Gynecological it gets more boring even quicker.
In 1990 I was selling videos mail order ad the vast majority of them was a girl on a bad, sofa or in a kitchen. But there were only 5 of us doing it in the UK. And it didn't harm sales. Today with 10s of 1,000s of sites innovation is badly required. Yet very thin on the ground.