Thank you guys for the great feedback. To answer some questions, the content appears on Alexis-angel.com and is nowhere near hardcore. All softcore modeling stuff. Further the girl is a 27 year old woman not a 19 year old girl. She did other photoshoots as well including FTv girls. To be honest the only reason I even worked with her was because I felt bad for her! She really wanted to do a site and thought she would earn alot of money by doing it. During our first few conversations she told me she was 21 and sent me a bunch of photoshopped pics which she looked great in. When she finally arrived after a long trip I realized this was not the girl she said she was. But I gave her a chance anyway. She was paid the bonus fee for initial galleries needed to launch then she would receive 50%. Her site didnt make much and she wasn't happy. So she went to work with nikkis playmates. Nikki had the same outcome!!! Now the girl is coming after both us and Nikki! And p.s. She is a stripper!
The guy who initially called both Nikki and us, claimed he was her attorney. His name was Alan sklar. You can google his name I believe from creative media. When you google him he is a private investigator. Nowhere does it say attorney. After declining his request to remove the content unless it is paid for, I do realize my services are worth more than the 3k I requested but I know she wouldn't even have more money to pay..... The girl is broke, the guy emails back a note from "his attorney". The note says to sum up, some bs about the release not being valid, and also that Martha is entitled to damages because her content is being pirated and other people are making money from her images. Claiming we are liable for those damages! They go on to say that Martha wasn't paid properly so the way they can figure how much she should have been paid is by comparing to other models in the industry to see whatthey make and get a sum from that!!! Lol!! I can get the attorney's name I don't have it on me at the moment but I looked him up as well and he is some kind of small business lawyer. Nothing related to entertainment or Internet. So that's where we are now. I haven't replied back to his last response. I am thinking about having a statement from a lawyer written up as wwell. Anyone care to write back a response to them?
