Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopottomouse
You're making it about you - seem mega touchy for some reason.
A lot of the conflicting opinions in Japan are likely to be because not many people are going to think "oooh a possible nuclear disaster, I must go and have a proper close-up look". Far safer to theorise from a distance.
|
even though this is gfy, i was surprised to find myself having to defend the position of thnking it's better to have better information. i was esp. surprised to find myself arguing that point with you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by theking
I really cannot understand why you think you are not being given viable information.
Some radiation has been released into the atmosphere and some people are being treated for radiation exposure while thousands of others have been evacuated from the area...as the Japanese fight to prevent a total meltdown in up to three facilities. What do you find to be not viable/
|
here are just 2 quotes i found illustrating the issue.
Quote:
|
there were few details about what was being done to bring the situation under control.
|
Quote:
|
Edano, for his part, denied there had been a meltdown in the Fukushima Daiichi complex, but other officials said the situation was not so clear.
|
the lack of transparency re: what is the most catastrophic nuclear event of our lifetimes and i'm having to defend the position of wanting more accurate info.
that's gfy!