Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherry7
From what I can see you are not bring much to the table...
The models do all the work, and the "program makers" seem to add very little, just record in an amateur way the action.
Frankly Bankbus, your site and all he others mentioned are 99% the same....
It is not money that is missing its thought.
For example, instead of using the lights to flat light everything, try lighting the scene to a mood...there you go no change in cost but something different.
How about different lenses? maybe shoot it all on a long lens? from POV of a Voyer...
Imagination does not cost money.
So when you want you push the "I am a photographer" and as soon as that is challenged you say "I am just a pornographer"
There is a Czech film "Closely Observed Trains" Directed by Jiri Menzel from 1967 it has scene in it hotter that 95% of the porn today. (Best Foreign Film !)
Better less but better
|
Good points. Yes way too many sites take one idea/theme and keep repeating it. The end result is unless the member is totally in love with that way of shooting he's off to see another way of shooting. A little while ago I wrote a thread about bringing in different themes to porn scenes. Also wrote about going to more live scenes.
However they still require shooters with skills and a budget to match.
Our content was largely based on our ability to find brand new models. Magazines, especially teen ones lapped them up and paid very well. However we did change a little. We didn't fly to Spain or Portugal, we didn't get very elaborate and we kept to a very similar format. Because that's what paid the most.
Also giving a brand new model something a bit out there to do isn't great, having to cope with a new model and a new theme isn't good. Especially if the increase in profits were none.
Magazines got around this problem by using different shooters in the same magazine, so for them it wasn't an issue. Sites using the same shooter, same theme gets boring. Especially after 30 or 60 days.
"Closely Observed Trains" is one film probably shot on a far better budget than porn. One film shot over and over again gets boring. That's why it's essential to bring out the girls true character and I wrote about that. She will make every scene hers, if she would only be herself.
As for lens. Never change a lens on a digital camera, it results on dust on the chips and spots on the image. I thought you would know all this.