|
So from what you say about the scene you watched is that it should not be shot that badly?
The microphone should hang from the ceiling somewhere...
Should it not be on a boom, with a professional boom swinger and sound recordest ?
Should not the scene be lit professionally too ? with a full professional crew?
Is the complaint that it should be shot in an amateur way but not "badly amateur"....
You talk about magazines, but the photography they promoted was repetitive, boring, same flat lighting, same stale ideas week after week, just change the girls. Was it really that diffferent ?
About the same as MET ART, all done to a formula.... So the magazines were just as guilty as what you accuse the websites of being, the minimum technical standards to make money...
The most creative photography and film making has not been found in porn, even though it has the money to fund it...
It is if the people in porn are cut off from normal culture and don't see films TV or photography in the mainstream...
Surly if shooters want to make better quality websites they are free to do so. We feel free to do want we want, exactly how we want...
In fact, we would encourage websites to shoot with planes going overhead, drop those shoes, no dear you don't look bored, love the the ink, they don't look fake at all, yes those grunts are totally believable....
|