Quote:
Originally posted by Digipimp
Yeah he was lying and I think he's a horrible fucking president. However anyone who pays attention to world news more than US news would have known he was full of shit long before now. The truth is we were attacking Iraq because they were our easiest target over there and not liked by the rest of the middle east so we could take them over with the least reprucussions, and gain a deal on their oil and oil contracts. But that was just the begining, the bigger picture was to setup a forward base of operation right in the middle of the fucking middle east so we could get directly at Iran, cutting Iran's nuke program will have two effects, 1 it will shut them down from owning nukes, but bigger than that, they are North Korea's #1 customer and we will have eliminated N Korea's #1 customer and their outlet for selling their systems. It pays to be informed, all of this is going to be interesting since we still aren't going after the money supply which is Saudia Arabia, and if we never go after the money, we'll never slow terrorism down. When Bin Laden said he was going to take down America too many of you dumbasses took him literally. All along his plan was to gain control and power of Saudia Arabia and their oil and money as well as the two holyiest muslim sites and he's doing it and we aren't stopping it because of our own greed.
|
yeah i agree with most of that, and can see some sense in the rest.. so.. whats the theory on why little bush can lie to invade iraq and the press gives him a free pass ???
- should we believe the hippie crackhead theories about the major press outlets being controlled by a few corporations, and those corps are in bed with bush... that does seem a bit too "goverment conspiracy"...and it also gives little bush more credit than he deserves....
so the question remains.. why doesnt the press bust his balls like they should be doing?