Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendzilla
You havn't shown me anything that wasn't done before by others, nothing stands out, it was less than a month after he took office he the nomination , you can't prove anything, because there is nothing there!
He ordered a reveiw, but what was done? Still open, FAIL!!!
5 December 2001 START I Deadline United States and Russia announce they have met final START I requirements, completing the largest arms control reductions in history.
Where is Bush's Nobel?, Or Clintons?
EFFORT< WHAT DID HE CHANGE?
The rest of the world still hates us, the way he handled Israel was really good, LMAO, Sorry, my dinner is getting cold, theres the door!
I'm not being a hater, but you havn't showed me anything that separates him from past presidents to deserve a NOBEL, you have NOTHING!
|
This isn't about other people or what others have done... I'm sure plenty of others deserved the award more.
But that isn't for you to decide, the panel that gave him the award said it was his dedication to nuclear reduction and his talks with others throughout the world, promoting peace, changing global opinion, etc - which both did happen.
I really don't give a shit if you accept that they gave it to him for arms reduction and making the world a little less pissed off over an illegal war. Accept it or not, that is why he got it.
You seem confused.. the award is given for effort, not for change.
He doesn't have to be different from past presidents to get a Nobel. I never had anything, I simply stated the actual reasons he got the award - and you can't accept that, because of your hate.