Quote:
Originally posted by toodamnfli
exactly but when it comes to high profile cases the heat gets turned up a bit. i'm sure the prosecution will weasel themselves around this and ask questions that were only answered on the tapes.Of course they aren't going to admit to having recorded any substancial evidence because that would throw the case out the window
|
The police had a legal wire tap so anything said by Peterson that was not between him and his Attorney or the Attorney's investigator can be used in court if it is ruled to be important to the case. If the Police actually taped conversation between Peterson's Attorney or the Attorney's investigator the case is in trouble. If the Police actually taped conversation between Peterson's Attorney or the Attorney's investigator and any member of the prosecution team was privy to the recorded conversation...the case more than likely will be dismissed.
It is a felony in California to tape record a conversation between a client and his Attorney or the Attorney's agent. So if the Police did in fact record a conversation between Peterson and his Attorney or the Attorney's investigator...the Police and possibly members of the Prosecution could be charged with a felony.