Quote:
Originally Posted by blackmonsters
If affiliates really want a true 50/50 then I expect a lot of angry affiliates
after they join a sponsor and send 2 sign ups that charge back and they
end up owning the sponsor $30 after they are invoiced for their half of the
charge back fees.
This shit has been figured out over years.
Stop un-fucking-figuring it OK!
 |
Then again what if the charge backs really only happened because of the default cross sales? It's not like the affiliate gets paid for them in the first place and they will often increase charge backs and refunds (despite what the sponsors claim)because it seems like a scam to most people not familiar with the way they work. The reason programs keep them is because often
they still make more money by having them. But again the affiliate gets nothing for them so why should the affiliate pay for the higher charge backs?
Speaking of which how much more would the average rev share affiliate be getting if they got a 50% cut of the sponsor's share of the profit from these cross sales? 10 - 15% more per month? That just goes to show you that it is as I said. Affiliates are sending revenue. They just aren't getting their cut. An extra 10% would help many an affiliate these days and on rev share it really is their money because they sent the customer. That's how rev share used to be. These days what is called rev share often is nothing close.