Originally Posted by gideongallery

i will the point again

TOS do not supercede the LAW

you tried to argue that nat could take down the content/ban a user for any reason because they said they could in the tos.

and i addressed that point before

eharmony got sued and lost because they banned gay people from their site, (by not allowing male seeking male.women seeking women signups) they even had a legitimate reason they had no idea 49 points of compatibility that worked for straight people would apply for gay people and it was not cost effective to test it out for only 10% of the population

even financial viability was not a valid defense against descrimination laws

bottom line if youtube was to remove all the videos i post , i would point to the one example of the video staying up and ask the question why is a white person videos allowed to stay up when their account was banned and they would lose and would pay out just as much damages as if they had said they did it because i was a hahahahahaha

bottom line nothing you are pointing to changes the fact that youtube does not remove the videos when they delete an account

they only take down the videos that have a violation that has been logged, weather that be a legally justified internal tos condition, a law or dmca takedown notice.

everything else stays up. and dscrimination laws guarrentee that example has to be universally applicable rule.