Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
He tried to upload it, it was blocked and he complained on his twitter. With all of his followers it was a story very quickly and YouTube looked into it. He could have gotten the same results had he just asked the label or YouTube privately. They didn't give in because he complained, they made a mistake. It really is that simple.
|
re read the article
he complained publically on twitter BLAMING youtube
youtube techs responded publically back explaining it was the record company decision
it was not a mistake by youtube, it was a CHOICE by the record company, they set the flag to auto delete it
the record company had to go in and change the flag to allow it.
Youtube never made a mistake, all i am saying is preferential treatment, setting one companies flag to delete and another to allow is as much a monopoly abuse as when standard oil gave one station full supply of regular gas, and short supplied another with that grade (again never reduced to zero only short supplied them)
Quote:
You do have something to gain. No it isn't money. It is credibility. To everyone but you it looked like you claimed to already be started "building the sites" for whatever network you were going to put together for this and you claimed to have sent him an email about all of this. It then became clear that you misunderstood the deal. By day to day operation he meant that he would run the members area of the site, handle the content and billing etc and it would be your job to get the traffic and send the joins. When you realized he meant it was going to be more than you just showing him a few things and walking away you suddenly started backing out. You said you told him what you would do in the email (as you still do now) and he claims to have never gotten it. You won't show proof that you sent it so it is your word Vs. his word.
I'm not asking you to give away you content. I'm not asking you to give away your secret. Just show a screenshot of the email and black out anything that could be considered sensitive.
|
there is no way whatsoever you can claim that agreeing to handle
100% of the day to day operations of the joint venture could mean just running the membership site, and me handling all the other shit
there is no possible way he can claim that he didn't realize that i wanted to show him a bunch of stuff and then just walk away becuase i specifically said that what i would do
and that when he stated it would be cool as long as it produced 100 sales a day.
those two fact make it impossible for the deal to be anything other than me showing him a bunch of techniques, his staff implementing them, and i keep teaching until the site generates 100 sales a day.
any other interpretation of produce 100 sales a day would explictly violate the 100% agreement he made publically
however when Doc Publically tried to change "produce" to mean you do all the work, and all the day to day maintance to get those sales (a statement which clearly and absolutely violates the 100% agreement) you defended his position (hell your still trying to do it now).
Given that fact if i were to post the screenshot, you and robbie would simply find some way to "explain" how that screen shot was not good enough.
I would gain zero credibity from posting the screen shot becuase you would misrepresent things to back the doc lying ways.
I gain nothing from posting, and i have a potential of gaining something by not posting (since one of you guys might finally have the balls to back up your bullshit name calling with some cash).
Quote:
|
You won't do that because you know that the email doesn't exist.
|
so why don't you put up the 100k in the escrow account and let see which one of us is right.