[QUOTE=gideongallery;17768340]
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
did you read the article at all, it up now after he complained
the power of press not a mistake caused the change.
anyway, your arguement that the contract prevents so it ok is bullshit that the point of anti trust law, microsoft contract with OEM prevent them from preloading ie,
it was still invalidated by anti trust law, a contract does not supercede the laws of the country
fair use
anti trust all take priority to contract agreements.
if a term of an agreement violates the law that term is invalid even if both parties agreed to it.
|
He tried to upload it, it was blocked and he complained on his twitter. With all of his followers it was a story very quickly and YouTube looked into it. He could have gotten the same results had he just asked the label or YouTube privately. They didn't give in because he complained, they made a mistake. It really is that simple.
Quote:
my god you love misrepresenting what i said
let me spell it out- i sent doc the letter clarifying what the deal was (him doing 100% of the day to day operations)
- doc never responded
- doc claimed he never recieved it
- i sent it again
- doc claimed he never recieved it and then publically claimed the deal was something different IN THIS FORUM (now i was supposed to do 100% day to day operations of private tracker, hiring models, product placement, chat studio etc basically turning it into a standard affiliate deal)
- you tried to explain who turning it into a standard affilate agreement was a good deal
- Doc demanded i post the screen shot
- i said i would do it only IF he agreed to do the deal as we originally agreed not his new bullshit made up way
- doc disappeared and you tried to defend him again saying i should do it even though i gain no benefit
i don't post it because i gain no benefit period. No money is comming my way for doing it
and considering how when DOC backpeddled from agreeing to handle "100% of the day to day operations" to demanding i handle the all the operations of the "private tracker" including all the "day to day operations" you defended it there is no way it will change anyones opinion if i do.
give me something to post, put 100k in an escrow.com account with the condition all i have to do is show the image of the email i sent to claim the money.
if you truely believed docs statements you should have no problem doing it.
i am betting you will bitch out like robbie when i offered to post it if he put all his content in the public domain if i do.
BTW i think it funny that you keep demanding that i give you my content for free, while arguing that i am the person who believes that i am entitled to everyone elses content for free.
For the record i never said once, i have only defended free speech, and fair use (not paying twice for content).
|
You do have something to gain. No it isn't money. It is credibility. To everyone but you it looked like you claimed to already be started "building the sites" for whatever network you were going to put together for this and you claimed to have sent him an email about all of this. It then became clear that you misunderstood the deal. By day to day operation he meant that he would run the members area of the site, handle the content and billing etc and it would be your job to get the traffic and send the joins. When you realized he meant it was going to be more than you just showing him a few things and walking away you suddenly started backing out. You said you told him what you would do in the email (as you still do now) and he claims to have never gotten it. You won't show proof that you sent it so it is your word Vs. his word.
I'm not asking you to give away you content. I'm not asking you to give away your secret. Just show a screenshot of the email and black out anything that could be considered sensitive. You won't do that because you know that the email doesn't exist.