[QUOTE=kane;17752800]
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
in response to you claiming that his actions were a copyright violation simply because he had a record contract (since were trying to claim the COPYRIGHT based takedown was valid)
in which case the fair use of commentary is relevent to your arguement (unrelated to my original complaint of anti trust) since it justified the posting even IF he signed a contract.
I just said he may have had a contract the prevented him from posting it. You are the one that then created a bunch of other arguments over it. There is no use in arguing fair use in this case. The case is over. Did you read the article? It was a mistake and video is up. There is no anti-trust. There is no free speech issue. There is no fair use issue. There was a mistake made, Bieber overreacted as 15 year old kids (and you) often do and now everything is fine.
There really is nothing left to talk about here.
|
did you read the article at all, it up now after he complained
the power of press not a mistake caused the change.
anyway, your arguement that the contract prevents so it ok is bullshit that the point of anti trust law, microsoft contract with OEM prevent them from preloading ie,
it was still invalidated by anti trust law, a contract does not supercede the laws of the country
fair use
anti trust all take priority to contract agreements.
if a term of an agreement violates the law that term is invalid even if both parties agreed to it.
Quote:
|
This is 100% pure and utter horseshit! You know it. You have zero credibility. All you would have to do is black out any potentially sensitive material in the email that you don't want people to see and post the screen shots that shows you made this offer to him and he accepted it. The problem is this is about the third or fourth version of the story. First there was no response. Then you said you sent it but he never replied. Then you said you sent it and he tried to change the deal. Now you won't post it because you have nothing to gain. The deal is dead. It is never going to happen, but you can make yourself look like something more than a self-righteous schizophrenic who feels entitled to everyone's content without paying for it if you just post the email. Just black out everything but you making the offer as you claim you did and his reply backing out. Post it and the header and maybe you could gain a little credibility. But you won't because we both know there is no email.
|
my god you love misrepresenting what i said
let me spell it out
- i sent doc the letter clarifying what the deal was (him doing 100% of the day to day operations)
- doc never responded
- doc claimed he never recieved it
- i sent it again
- doc claimed he never recieved it and then publically claimed the deal was something different IN THIS FORUM (now i was supposed to do 100% day to day operations of private tracker, hiring models, product placement, chat studio etc basically turning it into a standard affiliate deal)
- you tried to explain who turning it into a standard affilate agreement was a good deal
- Doc demanded i post the screen shot
- i said i would do it only IF he agreed to do the deal as we originally agreed not his new bullshit made up way
- doc disappeared and you tried to defend him again saying i should do it even though i gain no benefit
i don't post it because i gain no benefit period. No money is comming my way for doing it
and considering how when DOC backpeddled from agreeing to handle "100% of the day to day operations" to demanding i handle the all the operations of the "private tracker" including all the "day to day operations" you defended it there is no way it will change anyones opinion if i do.
give me something to post, put 100k in an escrow.com account with the condition all i have to do is show the image of the email i sent to claim the money.
if you truely believed docs statements you should have no problem doing it.
i am betting you will bitch out like robbie when i offered to post it if he put all his content in the public domain if i do.
BTW i think it funny that you keep demanding that i give you my content for free, while arguing that i am the person who believes that i am entitled to everyone elses content for free.
For the record i never said once, i have only defended free speech, and fair use (not paying twice for content).