|
This is the THIRD TIME these questions have been posted. Still awaiting an answer
MICKEY: I ask you here and now to answer these two YES or NO questions.
Will you provide me with the 31 screennames of the "fraudulent" sales?
Once I provide you with the LJ screennames will you tell me where the 20 mystery sales picked up the LJ cookie?
I think lots of people would want to know the answers to these questions, especially about the cookie
It would seem that all your non-whitelabel affiliates are losing sales because of your cookie policy. Shouldn't the webmaster who was last visited by the customer have the right to know who the previous webmaster is when that's the guy getting paid for that sale?
If you don't give us that info that leaves us no way to verify that we're not getting screwed.
You have publicly stated your interest in demonstrating to your affiliates that you're not skimming sales.
The ONLY way I can think of to prove you're not skimming is to provide the name of the affiliate that got the sale.
PUT UP OR SHUT UP.
.
.
|