|
Looks like we're right back where we started.
Mickey wrote me to say that the 31 "fraudulent" sign-ups were re-evaluated by their "Risk Department" and once again determined to be bogus.
I wrote back and asked him to give me the screen names of the offending customers so I could do my own investigation.
He has not replied and I somehow doubt I'll get the info I requested.
When an affiliate gets a charge-back they are provided the screen name of the customer. Mickey won't give me that same info because unlike most other affiliates, I can contact the customer once I know the screen name.
So, it looks like the issue of the "Fraudulent" sales will remain a source of contention between us for a very long time and I'll have no choice but to get the lawyers involved.
Remember, I'm challenging AWE to explain why I didn't get paid for 50+ sales at $222 each.
31 so-called "fraudulent" sales and 20 +/- sales that mysteriously never got credited to me in the first place.
Next I will demand a DETAILED and SUBSTANTIVE RESPONSE as to why I didn't get paid on 20+ CONFIRMED LJ SIGN-UPS. I don't think LJ will give me the info citing "privacy" issues.
MICKEY: I ask you here and now to answer these two YES or NO questions.
Will you provide me with the 31 screennames of the "fraudulent" sales?
Once I provide you with the LJ screennames will you tell me where the 20 mystery sales picked up the LJ cookie?
EVERYONE ELSE: Do you believe that a Affiliate Webmaster is entitled this info when there is a dispute with a Program Operator?
|