Quote:
Originally Posted by DamianJ
It's black or white Paul. You have censorship or you don't.
I don't think that you should have censorship. And if that means things that you seem to think are disgusting like BDSM and scat have websites, then sobeit.
I realise this means websites *I* think are horrible will have to exist.
But as the VERY SIMPLE option is allow everything, or let the government censor the internet, I vote for allow everything.As a pornographer, it astounds me you trust any government not to block access to your work. But OK. We have different opinions and are unlikely to alter each other's opinion, are we?
|
So you think no censorship, allow everything.
So CP and Snuff movies are fine. So long as the seller or publisher has no involvement with the production.
Of course if the product is illegal, the selling of it is illegal, the publishing of it is illegal then is should be stopped.
Just like counterfeit or pirated goods should be stopped.
As a pornographer who worked in the UK during heavy censorship I have first hand experience of it. You don't. So that's why I don't fear it.
If all we were allowed to show was a nipple, we showed that and made a fortune doing it. It won't go back to that, it's an extreme example, but where the line is drawn there's money to be made there.
Should stolen goods be sold on the Internet without it being a crime?
And do you think the US Government will stop at just this law if it doesn't work or do you think they will go further?