Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
Which shows clearly how bothered some are about pirating and shooting legal or promoting legal content.
Those girls are the type of girls that turn up at a casting. Waiting for the girls that are legal and look 18 or under isn't going to make money.
Stocktrader thought about shooting it himself, so I listed some of the situations that might pop up here. http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...5&postcount=13
It's not as easy as he thinks.
The best way to get this content is to pay the girls themselves to shoot it. Stipulating a few things like IDs, model releases, no copyright logos or trademarks in the content. Then sorting out the girls who fit the profile required and paying them enough. One site said he paid girls $100 for an hours video and + 100 images. Good luck with the response.
That's not the only disconnect. The main one is customers who think it can be learned and shot for peanuts.
All producers are good at finding new girls, it's a major part of the job. Don't you think we haven't worked out we could get the girl to shoot it herself or the boyfriend to do it? We don't bother because the prices offered ain't worth shit. As Chronig pointed out.
Chronig, this is what you get for shit money. In fact I would never of shot these sets if they hadn't been making $500 each from magazine sales. Do you really expect shooters to bother for $100 to $150 ?
|
Old man Markham - anything you shot in the 1980s doesn't quality as exgf content. Firstly, it doesn't qualify as 2010 content PERIOD because of the SHITTY COMPRESSION OF THE GOD DAMNED PICTURES. Secondly, it doesn't quality BECAUSE EX-GF WASN'T AROUND IN 1980!!!
EXGF is *NOT* "AMATEUR!"
I don't know why you can't get this through your head. It's simple - stop posting your 1980s porn in EXGF content/discussion threads. Simple.