View Single Post
Old 10-25-2010, 11:33 AM  
Barry-xlovecam
It's 42
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Global
Posts: 18,083
Some Clarification ...

First of all, I misspoke Saturday night ? XLoveCam's current definition is HQ as in high quality.
My apologies for that ...

As for the statement
Quote:
Originally Posted by xsabn
[Y]ou sort models by resolution and frame rate, which is not fair for many good models. ...
This is the customer's selected default sort ? non-HQ models appear after the HQ models available. This is not the default sort of XloveCam? this is the customer's selection.

Rule #1 ? The customer is always right, in the end ? he pays his money ...

Here I must disagree ? customers expect and demand better cam quality and "good models" will supply it. The "good model" will obtain or be provided with compliant broadcast equipment and facilities for the reason of greater profits for the model's efforts ? after all, this is a business not a hobby, on this I am sure you would agree ... Capital expenditure is part of running a business.
Details of XloveCam's Flux Manager for "High Quality" broadcasting.
  • We currently have 320x240 and 640x480 image upload capacity.
  • Bandwidth settings that are available currently to broadcasting cams; 100, 200, 320, 480, 650 kbs or a 2.5 mps (2500) maximum accepted send bandwidth.
  • At 2.5 mps Xlovecam accepts a very high send rate competitive or exceeding current industry standards.
  • User selected values of 15-20-30fps are available
  • With a maximum of 30 fps we are at the top end available currently.
We are currently testing true HD=1280x720 in a pre-alpha stage with release by mid 2011 a hopeful possibly.
Barry-xlovecam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote