Quote:
Originally Posted by moeloubani
Scared to answer the question?
Try again:
According to your ethics:
Would you let a baby laying there live or die.
|
already addressed that
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...&postcount=110
Quote:
Originally Posted by u-Bob
If I'd see a starving baby by the side of the road, I'd take it in and care for it.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by moeloubani
Would there be any ethical obligation to assist the baby so that it may live or should it be left there to die because it can not fend for itself.
|
already addressed that:
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...&postcount=134
Quote:
Originally Posted by u-Bob
Ethically: Every human being is free to do with his body and property what he wants as long as he doesn't cause damage to another human being or his property. That answers your question.
If I need to spell it out for you: Ethically, you have no obligation to do anything with your body, you don't want to do.
Ethically: If your neighbor is drowning, you don't have to jump after him to save him.
Morally: If one of my neighbor's just stood by when another neighbor was drowning, I would never talk to that neighbor again, I wouldn't do business with hem again,....
Personally: I've already saved a friend from drowning.
And I have already addressed the issue of the starving baby.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by moeloubani
Answer the question.
|
already addressed that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by moeloubani
What would you do? Don't answer a bunch of different questions. ACCORDING TO YOUR ETHICS. Not your morality.
|
Ethics = rules about what is right and what is wrong. It's the basic set of rules to prevent injustice (I've explained this on the first page).
Morality = personal guidelines by which you decide to live your life.
Now there's no such thing as MY or YOUR ethics. Ethics are universal. Morality is personal.
In this thread have already explained both the ethics involved and what my personal reaction would be in the situation you described.
Quote:
Originally Posted by moeloubani
Don't be scared to say it: you would let the baby die.
|
reading comprehension?
I started this thread because I am opposed to people murdering babies. I already said that I would help a starving baby and now you have the nerve to post that?
Let's not forget, you are the one who thinks it's ok to use violence and murder innocent babies to set an example.
Quote:
Originally Posted by moeloubani
So if everyone lived life according to your ethics where killing a baby to make sure a rule is held so millions don't suffer is wrong but letting a baby die because it can't fend for itself, where do you think society would be right now?
|
What would you do if you found a starving baby? You obviously have no problem with killing babies to make a point (set an example). What would you do?
I've already stated what I would do. And I'm sure most people in my community would act in the same way and help the starving baby.
Quote:
Originally Posted by moeloubani
Do you see NOW how you are flawed in your way of thinking? You would let a baby DIE according to your ethics
|
see above.
Quote:
Originally Posted by moeloubani
but you would prevent the killing of the same baby even if it was for the greater good.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by moeloubani
There is no longer any argument, now that it has been shown that your way of thinking leads to every human on Earth having to fend for themselves when they are born and therefore dying. No humans = logic fail.
|
my way: human creativity and human cooperation.