Quote:
Originally Posted by Roald
exception?
Man I can name tons of situations where the police SHOULD use their weapons to catch someone.
Now in this particular case it might seem a bit too much (don't know the real story) but saying police should not use their weapons to catch someone is just plain bs  |
I quote
Quote:
|
I think all weapons that cops carry should only be used for protection only, even the non lethal ones, I don't understand why they need to use it to catch someone, thats just wrong
|
The case you stated before falls into "Use for protection" if the officers lets a murderer runs away there may be new victims, in that case the use of brutal force in justified
So the rule still fully applies