View Single Post
Old 10-08-2010, 11:26 AM  
borked
Totally Borked
 
borked's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by PXN View Post
Clearly a way better and cheaper solution that FSC/APAP fingerprinting approach.

Great post borked!
well, to be honest, the solutions are not really comparable...

The OP was designed at *preventing* content ever being able to get uploaded. Then it evolved to involve injecting use data to track the pirate down, then it evolved to finding copyrighted content to help automate the process in finding copyrighted content already out there.

The FSC solution is to prevent content getting onto those tube sites that are a part of the circle, which I'm not too hot about since that leaves the others free to do as they please.

Let's just say they are complementary approaches to the same goal.

My goal is to evolve the thread to be able to detect movies, but that I fear may never happen outside of a "proof of concept" sandbox due to the bandwidth involved, but hey, I can surprise myself sometime

All this knowledge btw is already out there in forms of scientific papers who have shown ways to detect identical/similar images/videos. The hard part is implementing it in a real-world cost-effective situation.
__________________

For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com
(consider figuring out the email as test #1)



All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202
borked is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote