|
eroswebmaster, your points are valid when you cay "could be". Initially this was about people saying "it is".
When you did say "You weren't there, you do not know what occured before the filming, or after the filming." You are entirely correct, I was not there, none of us where there, nor was any potential prosecutor. In such a case they go by the video or the pictures and decide the intent of the photographer (see such case history) and also on how it was labled (again see such case histories).
The most valid point that has been made to it being CP has been pretty much overlooked though. This point being some of our peers (more liberal than nearly any jury we could wish for) say it is. That in itself is the fucked part of this situation.
eroswebmaster, I do not think you think this is CP, I do however think you are playing a little devils advocate here, which is cool.
Anyone (well those not in the top tax bracket) can be prosecuted for anything and loose. Maybe not in the court room every time but at least in the media. As the Feds like to say "you can beat the rap, but can not beat the ride".
I do not see this as CP nor anything remotely close to it. The chance of getting busted for having it would indeed be slim to none. Is there a chance, guess so by the responses of our peers.
|