Oh gee, looks like I missed your post, since I skimmed and noticed my tagline at the bottom of it.
Quote:
Originally posted by nevermind
Actually, I do agree with you on this point --- very much so. Ibill screwed up with Mastercard, so did PayPal as well.
|
LOL your childish persistence with this fallacy just doesn't stop does it. If you had 15 chargebacks and 16 credits in a single month, Mastercard could choose to fine you for those credits by treating them as chargebacks. I realize that your mind doesn't do math well at this point, so we'll leave this one here.
Quote:
Originally posted by nevermind
As far back as August, 2002, there have been many GFY threads where many webmasters have questioned Epoch's billing practices --- and whether they were pushing the limits on chargebacks.
The response from Epoch was always the same: Don't worry about it. We know what we are doing. We won't cause you any problems with the credit card companies.
|
Call me blind but don't call me deaf. The major sponsors and other processors in this industry are delighted with Epoch's lawsuit and see the reasoning behind it. Of course they are also the same guys using Epoch, who also use cross sells etc and don't have additional chargeback issues because if that use. I'm so sorry that the people who are the backbone of this industry don't agree with you, I'm going to email them all right now and tell them they are wrong. I am sure they will be delighted to know that before they also file their suits against Mastercard.
Quote:
Originally posted by nevermind
The Mastercard lawsuit told completely different story. Epoch was being fined millions of dollars during the same time period they were telling webmasters everything was fine. By their own account, it's gotten so bad that they had to file suit.
|
Wow, you're a pornographer and an attorney? Who'da thunk it? You obviously have never filed or counterfiled in any sort of civil suit that was handled outside of small claims court. Geez, Brad Shaw managed to generate as much paperwork in one response to my attorney as Epoch did in their initial Mastercard claim. But then again I guess your brilliant legal mind never realized that attorneys pile it on, since a judge is going to trim the fat heavily in any suit of this size.
Quote:
Originally posted by nevermind
On top of that, Chris Mallick blatantly lies to me about Epoch's supposed lack knowledge about Mastercard's rules when, in fact, they did know --- and mismanaged the situation --- badly.
|
Chris Mallick blatantly lies to you? Or you blatantly libel and defame Chris Mallick with that statement? I think the jury wouldn't have too much trouble deciding this argument.
Quote:
Originally posted by nevermind
But we're not going to disclose details of the Epassporte operation.
It comes down to credibility, and there's not much to speak of.
|
No, we aren't disclosing how ePassporte is run.
Especially not to someone anonymous with no credibility. Not even to think of, much less to speak of.