View Single Post
Old 09-19-2010, 06:39 AM  
McSpike
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by howard View Post
If you have a family and you need schools for your kids then you buy. But it is a losing proposition. Take 30 years mort and pay least possible. Don't pay 1 cent extra to pay off loan.

I bought house in 1990 for 300k. I put 100k into. I sold house in 1998 for 330k. WERE IN SAME PERIOD NOW.

If you bought mutual fund in 1990 and sold it in 1998. Here is fidelity magellan. Its know as 1 of the best funds.

In 1990 FMAGX was $13. In 1998 $53. Let me do some math for you. I put 20% down on that house so lets use figure of 70k.

My $70,000 I put down on House I could have bought magellan and in 1998 it would have been worth $286,000

Real estate market is in same down turn. So Im saying history says DONT BUY INVEST NOW.
shoulda, woulda, coulda...

this is 2010. you tell me where to invest my money to get 300% return in 7 years. it's all connected to risk. the more risk you take the more you make and the more you can lose. so expecting to gain that much in such a short period means you can affor to lose your 90k. do you? I am guessing not. therefore, do not tell me what you would be better off 20 years in the past. for 100 happy investing stories there's 100 unhappy ones.

I started throwing money into the funds when the crisis hit bottom. and I didn't expose myself. I made just enough to cover the losses and gain some.

and right now I'd be thrilled with about 8% annual return.

300%? well time to invest in shrilanka (this year alnoe they had 70%+ gains) or some other country I sure wouldn't stuck all my savings into. so...
McSpike is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote