Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaGuy
Regardless of how you personally feel about the "need" to investigate 9/11, any and all such disasters are usually treated as a crime scene and investigated thoroughly. But 9/11 was not. Why not?
|
WTF are you talking about? This was the largest crime scene ever. Every piece of debris was collected, and sent to NJ where they shifted through it looking for DNA and any evidence.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaGuy
|
Yes, it's perfect logical that after a plane hit a building, it fell. As for quote there, why hasn't hundreds of people involved in designing the building come forward with similar comments? Oh that's right, they have. The came forward and said the buildings was designed to withstand a impact of plane that was in the air when they designed the building - not the planes we fly thirty years later.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaGuy
The "collapse" wasn't hours later - it was an hour later. No way that was long enough even in a furnace that the steel could soften/melt/weaken so much top to bottom that the building would fall the way it did.
|
Again with the fire. Did not see the airplanes hit the building? Can you not begin to understand the amount of damage that was done to the structure of the building before any fire started?
Normally if take one of those beams of steel and heat it up to 500 degrees or whatever, it would take some time to degrade it. But if you slam it with a an airplane, boil it in jet fuel, and then demand it hold up twenty floors on it's own, well, it's gonna give way a lot quicker.