Quote:
Originally Posted by Brujah
I don't think so. The study for Bartels was published a few years ago and data was only available up until 2005 and some of that was projected I bet. Like my previous post mentioned though, you probably aren't really interested unless it supports your pre-existing view. Don't take that as an insult, just an observation. You were quick to dismiss it initially without finding out the truth and continued to do so without actually knowing. We could do this all day if you're just going to "suppose" things you don't know one way or the other, but really, why bother?
|
I was under the impression that the study was more recent, if it was indeed published few years ago, then my bad..
(Thunderballs really dropped the ball here though, posting about 5 year old study on gfy, wtf was he thinking? lol (!!!)

)