Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
All of your points are quickly and easily explained away... I'll reply to the comments about WTC 7, because that's my favorite.
You questioned WTC 7 falling, saying that it was "only on fire". You also said "Windsor in Madrid burned for 24 hours" but didn't fall. Both of these comments are full of holes. Part of the Windsor did collapse. And the Windsor didn't have two large skyscrapers fall nearly on top of it, removing one quarter of it's base. Your claiming WTC 7 fell because it was on fire, but it's more like it suffered two huge earthquakes, two huge towers falling nearly on top of, the building being removed off of it's foundation, a huge amount of it's support base being physically removed, AND it being on fire.
|
I don't remember saying it was "only on fire".
I did point out that part of the Windsor collapsed.
One quarter of it's base? Source me on that, 'cause I haven't found that. A chunk was taken out but why did the bldg go down vertically instead of back toward the path of least resistance?
There's no evidence of WTC7 being "removed off of it's foundation" that I've seen.
Other, closer buildings were severely and more seriously damaged, and on fire, and didn't collapse, either perfectly vertically or asymetrically, which is more probable with the sort of scenario you suggest.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotGauge
You expect them to fall over? because they were pushed by wind?
|
Uh, no, because since part of the lower section/s was/were compromised as it seems, damage and gravity caused the upper part/s to start falling, then the upper part/s would tend to tilt towards the weakened side/s, and be resisted by the less weakened, less compromised, whatever you want to call it, sections. There would be a toppling effect, which seemed to start happening, judging from the videos, but ultimately didn't - the whole thing pulverized and descended vertically, through the path of most resistance.
If this weirdness happened only once, you could write it off to coincidence. It happened twice with the towers, and a third time with the WTC7 building...
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Trash Heap
Jesus, you're retarded. 9 years later and this is what you come up with? Something that has been explained over and over again?
Fucking idiot.
|
Good argument. You've blown me away. Congrats.
:D