View Single Post
Old 09-12-2010, 06:45 AM  
MediaGuy
Confirmed User
 
MediaGuy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Montrealquebecanada
Posts: 5,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotGauge View Post
http://www.nytimes.com/1975/02/14/nyregion/14WTC.html

It is all how you present the "FACTS"

Fire was mainly on one floor.
Was not hit by a huge object traveling at a decent speed.
Things are a Bit heaver at the top with the pull of gravity pancaking down.
Anyway, this point and time you will not change one persons mind on what happened.
The pancaking seems ridiculous - it would have taken 10 times longer for one of the towers to fall and there would have been toppling or non-symmetrical events, but there weren't. Two differently damaged buildings fell exactly the same way - makes no sense, just on the basis of probability, disregarding the fact that fire doesn't bring down steel buildings.

Then there's building seven, which could win awards if there were such a thing for perfect, seamless demolition job.

:D
__________________

YOU Are Industry News!
Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com
Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB!
ICQ: 248843947
Skype: Mediaguy1
MediaGuy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote