Quote:
Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls
I am comparing the civilian deaths in a country we are not at war with PAKISTAN. Obama has TARGETED civilian HOMES AND FUNERALS. Obama has killed more civilians in PAKISTIAN than Bush. That is fact.
So, the right war in your mind is one where we target civilian homes, in a country we are not at war with, killing 1 ALLEGED terrorist for every 10 to 20 civilians killed, making more terrorist than we are killing, in "part of a war" that Obama's generals say there is no winning.  |
Yes, because Bush was fighting a war with Afghan, when we aren't at war with Afghan. When you take the war to the proper place, Civilians die.
Let's take a look at those attacks in Pakistan.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drone_attacks_in_Pakistan
04-08 - 405 deaths by Drones - 42 strikes for 10.37%
09-10 - 1013 deaths by Drones - 106 strikes for 10.46%
Well, looks like Obama's numbers aren't that bad after all, more attacks would naturally equal more deaths.
Then looking over the articles, it looks like July of this year to current 87 estimated militants deaths and 7 civilians. Just to compare the listed ones.
I just don't see the numbers you're saying...