Quote:
Originally Posted by cambaby
Well let me explain it to your small brain...
1. I troll a lot
2. The gay "marriage" issue is simply a political wedge tool, legal right extend beyond "marriage". A "civil union" and a "marriage" are the same thing in the eyes of the states.
3. PERSONALLY I think its a non-issue because it offers ZERO benefits to gay people over PROPERLY REGULATED civil unions and only acts to create a rift between gays and straights.
4. You open a whole can of worms when you start opening up "marriages" based on sexual PREFERENCE(and until homosexuality is proven to be genetic it will always be a preference).
Is that too much for you? Or would you like it more black and white for your little brain to understand?
|
So it sounds like you feel gay people should be allowed to have civil unions, but not get "married" because you feel allowing them to get "married" opens up a can worms and becomes a political tool.
Am I right about that?
If so, doesn't that fly against the conservative beliefs you posted above? If the government shouldn't be allowed to dictate social beliefs than anyone who wants to marry anyone else should be allowed to do so and the government should not be allowed to determine who can get married and who can get a civil union. There should only be one or the other. Either everyone can get married, or everyone gets a civil union.