Quote:
Originally Posted by Deej
this isnt court and just because thats a policy in court does not mean that being objective isnt possible.
I gave you perfect examples of how and why I was.
Youre one of the ones that are just arguing without staying on track with my words.
no high horse, never had one. In fact i chop ,myself more than anyone.
100% unbiased, no youre right...a s i did take a smidge more offense to Carlos bullshit claims since it was my friend. But im talking a 2% biasism at most. as where Carlos is comepletely biased to the situation. As are some in this thread.
YOu have to admit to that logic. if not... well then... You have a logic flaw.
|
Oh well I tried, it doesn't have to be court, its inherent in the definition of the word and that was the best analogy I could figure out to try and get you to understand. Once you have a close relationship with someone, at the point it becomes impossible to be completely objective on a matter involving them, thats just fact. It has nothing to do with tit for tat and how much you said for one party and not for the other. I'm not sure I see anything logical in what you're saying, I'm merely trying to correct you on something erroneous you said and I'm sorry this derailed the thread.
__________________
"WTF, on google you can find the answer to every question in human history, EXCEPT how to convert cams..
Its crazy..."
VenusBlogger