Quote:
Originally Posted by will76
I'll be the first to admit I advertise girls as "online" that probably aren't online. Plenty people use fake chat promos, the fake im box pop ups, or saying someone is in your city but they are not. 95% of us probably do some or all of that.
So... when I read this it made me think, would be fucked if Attorney generals ever went after porn / online sites? Almost everyday I get hit with some pop up from a site saying I am A WINNER!!! when you know i didn't win shit.
http://www.state.ia.us/government/ag..._Group%20.html
cliff notes. A company doing advertising for a car dealership advertised an event as " ?seized and repossessed? or ?liquidation? vehicles NEED TO GO! When in fact is was just their regular used cars from the lot with regular pricing. Also they offered scratch offs and other tactics to make people think they won something to get them in the store....
The AG is asking for $40,000 a violation.
so.... when we advertise someone as being in their town, they signup and that person is not. Is that any different (or worse) than saying this car has been repo'ed this price is rock bottom and it is just a car off the lot with normal pricing?
Seems to me we would be fucked. What do you think?
|
Well...I think that if a government agency really got serious about the false advertising/practices on porn sites the over whelming majority would be in serious trouble.