GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

Lensman · 05-14-2003, 02:12 PM

http://hugin.sigusr1.org/~pakin/complaint

This site knows alot about GFY:

I have facts for those who think and arguments for those who reason. Unless you share my view that GFY makes it its job to form the association in the public's mind between any wisecracks it disagrees with and the ideas of hate and violence and illegality, there's no need for you to hear me further. Please don't misinterpret that last statement to mean that all minorities are poor, stupid ghetto trash. That's not at all what it means. Rather, it means that I correctly predicted that GFY would oppress, segregate, and punish others. Alas, I didn't think it'd do that so effectively -- or so soon.

Although the themes in GFY's jibes are limited, GFY's few positive contributions will continue to be overshadowed by its broader message of hate. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that slatternly yobbos are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive, then there is definitely no hope for you. Rest assured, all the deals GFY makes are strictly one-way. GFY gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations. At the risk of repeating myself, I must reiterate that given the amount of misinformation that GFY is circulating, I must indeed point out that I am deliberately using colorful language in this letter. I am deliberately using provocative phrases that I hope will stick in the minds of my readers. I do ensure, however, that my words are always appropriate and accurate and clearly explain how GFY holds onto power like the eunuch mandarins of the Forbidden City -- sterile obstacles to progress who extirpate the things I unquestionably cherish.

If Fate desired that GFY make a correct application of what it had read about absolutism, it would have to indicate title and page number, since the immature organization would otherwise never in all its existence find the correct place. But since Fate does not do this, if GFY thinks that the majority of phlegmatic, useless hermits are heroes, if not saints, then it's sadly mistaken. GFY is debauched, crafty, sordid, parasitic, improvident, and sniffish. Need I go on? Admittedly, GFY's cajoleries are uniformly riddled by an unbelievable degree of ignorance. But that's because on the issue of mandarinism, GFY is wrong again. Sure, one can predict on empirical grounds that in a lustrum or two it will create a mass psychology of fear about an imminent terrorist threat. But GFY's recommendations have a distinctly garrulous tone. That conclusion is not based on some sort of antihumanist philosophy or on GFY-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that GFY truly believes that materialism is the key to world peace. I hope you realize that that's just a gin-swilling pipe dream from a bitter, incomprehensible pipe, and that in the real world, GFY's lies come in many forms. Some of its lies are in the form of scribblings. Others are in the form of conclusions. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion. While we do nothing, those who instill distrust and thereby create a need for its disruptive views are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we get it off our back.

When GFY says that we ought to worship insufferable pettifoggers as folk heroes, in its mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like it believes it has said something very profound. Contrary to popular belief, it seems that no one else is telling you that it would be good for the press to start paying attention to things like this. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, GFY's plans for the future symbolize lawlessness, violence, and misguided rebellion -- extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest of us lose more than a little freedom. Almost without exception, we find among narrow and uneducated minds the belief that this is the best of all possible worlds and that GFY is the best of all possible organizations. This belief is due to a basic confusion, which can be cleared up simply by stating that I myself like to speak of GFY as "complacent". That's a reasonable term to use, I claim, but let's now try to understand it a little better. For starters, some people think it's a bit extreme of me to expand people's understanding of its wild, ill-bred shenanigans -- a bit over the top, perhaps. Well, what I ought to remind such people is that I hate GFY's constant misuse of historical analogies, so to speak.

GFY's positions have no credibility. Yes, I could add that it is so delusional, I could adopt a new world-view, but I wanted to keep my message simple and direct. I didn't want to distract you from the main thrust of my message, which is that if it were up to GFY, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism. I have a New Year's resolution for GFY: It should pick up a book before it jumps to the distasteful conclusion that society is supposed to be lenient towards ignorant dolts. GFY has recently been going around claiming that the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk.

The implications of disingenuous, iconoclastic snobbism may seem theoretical, but they have concrete meaning for thousands of people. As long as I live and breathe, I will strive to find the common ground that enables others to build a true community of spirit and purpose based on mutual respect and caring, right? Right. The question, therefore, must not be, "Where are the people who are willing to stand up and acknowledge that GFY is notorious for trying to emphasize the negative in our lives instead of accentuating the positive?", but rather, "Why do we put up with it?". The latter question is the better one to ask, because this is clear to every knowledgeable observer. The sooner it comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us.

I may be opening a Pandora's box by writing this, but that's just one side of the coin. The other side is that GFY is tasteless -- maybe "brutish" would be a more applicable adjective. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to GFY. We must reach out to people with the message that grumpy practitioners of larrikinism in general, and GFY in particular, intend to create a kind of psychic pain at the very root of the modern mind. We must alert people of that. We must educate them. We must inspire them. And we must encourage them to shoo it away like the annoying bug that it is.

GFY claims that it is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong. This is a very malignant and unconstructive view and moreover, is wrong in many ways. Needless to say, if GFY can't stand the heat, it should get out of the kitchen. GFY is determined to put as little thought as possible into solving the undeniable problems that our society is still facing with regard to fetishism. It is also worthy of note that GFY's success is just a flash in the pan. So what's the connection between that and GFY's catch-phrases? The connection is that it really shouldn't use mass organization as a system of integration and control. That's just plain common sense. Of course, the people who appreciate its beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments) are those who eagerly root up common sense, prominently hold it out, and decry it as poison with astonishing alacrity.

It may seem difficult at first to set the stage so that my next letter will begin from a new and much higher level of influence. It is. But GFY seeks scapegoats for its own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target it can find, that is, unrestrained lummoxes. It is my fundamental belief that it strikes me as amusing that GFY complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! It does nothing but complain. The sole point of agreement between myself and pea-brained scatterbrains is that one must consider the semiotics of careerism in order to fully understand GFY's bait-and-switch tactics, and everyone with half a brain understands that.

My intention here is not just to expose some of GFY's profligate, diabolic deeds, but also to investigate GFY's perfidious, feckless principles, ideals, and objectives. It is easy to see faults in others. But it takes perseverance to take the initiative to oppose evil wherever it rears its demented head. GFY simply spouts endless fine-sounding cliches along with unintelligible, wayward dialectic. But even if we disregard all that and examine only GFY's sappy flimflams, this seems to me to be enough to show that when GFY hears anyone say that it is as mindless as the sky is blue, its answer is to discredit legitimate voices in the neocolonialism debate. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to defy it. I maintain I am not alone when I say that GFY is reluctant to resolve problems. It always just looks the other way and hopes no one will notice that I don't care what others say about it. It's still dastardly, piteous, and it intends to turn loons loose against us good citizens. So you see, GFY has neither honor nor integrity, nor even knows what those words mean.

05-14-2003, 02:12 PM
Lensman GFY Chaperone Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Adult.com Posts: 9,846	http://hugin.sigusr1.org/~pakin/complaint This site knows alot about GFY: I have facts for those who think and arguments for those who reason. Unless you share my view that GFY makes it its job to form the association in the public's mind between any wisecracks it disagrees with and the ideas of hate and violence and illegality, there's no need for you to hear me further. Please don't misinterpret that last statement to mean that all minorities are poor, stupid ghetto trash. That's not at all what it means. Rather, it means that I correctly predicted that GFY would oppress, segregate, and punish others. Alas, I didn't think it'd do that so effectively -- or so soon. Although the themes in GFY's jibes are limited, GFY's few positive contributions will continue to be overshadowed by its broader message of hate. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that slatternly yobbos are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive, then there is definitely no hope for you. Rest assured, all the deals GFY makes are strictly one-way. GFY gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations. At the risk of repeating myself, I must reiterate that given the amount of misinformation that GFY is circulating, I must indeed point out that I am deliberately using colorful language in this letter. I am deliberately using provocative phrases that I hope will stick in the minds of my readers. I do ensure, however, that my words are always appropriate and accurate and clearly explain how GFY holds onto power like the eunuch mandarins of the Forbidden City -- sterile obstacles to progress who extirpate the things I unquestionably cherish. If Fate desired that GFY make a correct application of what it had read about absolutism, it would have to indicate title and page number, since the immature organization would otherwise never in all its existence find the correct place. But since Fate does not do this, if GFY thinks that the majority of phlegmatic, useless hermits are heroes, if not saints, then it's sadly mistaken. GFY is debauched, crafty, sordid, parasitic, improvident, and sniffish. Need I go on? Admittedly, GFY's cajoleries are uniformly riddled by an unbelievable degree of ignorance. But that's because on the issue of mandarinism, GFY is wrong again. Sure, one can predict on empirical grounds that in a lustrum or two it will create a mass psychology of fear about an imminent terrorist threat. But GFY's recommendations have a distinctly garrulous tone. That conclusion is not based on some sort of antihumanist philosophy or on GFY-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that GFY truly believes that materialism is the key to world peace. I hope you realize that that's just a gin-swilling pipe dream from a bitter, incomprehensible pipe, and that in the real world, GFY's lies come in many forms. Some of its lies are in the form of scribblings. Others are in the form of conclusions. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion. While we do nothing, those who instill distrust and thereby create a need for its disruptive views are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we get it off our back. When GFY says that we ought to worship insufferable pettifoggers as folk heroes, in its mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like it believes it has said something very profound. Contrary to popular belief, it seems that no one else is telling you that it would be good for the press to start paying attention to things like this. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, GFY's plans for the future symbolize lawlessness, violence, and misguided rebellion -- extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest of us lose more than a little freedom. Almost without exception, we find among narrow and uneducated minds the belief that this is the best of all possible worlds and that GFY is the best of all possible organizations. This belief is due to a basic confusion, which can be cleared up simply by stating that I myself like to speak of GFY as "complacent". That's a reasonable term to use, I claim, but let's now try to understand it a little better. For starters, some people think it's a bit extreme of me to expand people's understanding of its wild, ill-bred shenanigans -- a bit over the top, perhaps. Well, what I ought to remind such people is that I hate GFY's constant misuse of historical analogies, so to speak. GFY's positions have no credibility. Yes, I could add that it is so delusional, I could adopt a new world-view, but I wanted to keep my message simple and direct. I didn't want to distract you from the main thrust of my message, which is that if it were up to GFY, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism. I have a New Year's resolution for GFY: It should pick up a book before it jumps to the distasteful conclusion that society is supposed to be lenient towards ignorant dolts. GFY has recently been going around claiming that the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk. The implications of disingenuous, iconoclastic snobbism may seem theoretical, but they have concrete meaning for thousands of people. As long as I live and breathe, I will strive to find the common ground that enables others to build a true community of spirit and purpose based on mutual respect and caring, right? Right. The question, therefore, must not be, "Where are the people who are willing to stand up and acknowledge that GFY is notorious for trying to emphasize the negative in our lives instead of accentuating the positive?", but rather, "Why do we put up with it?". The latter question is the better one to ask, because this is clear to every knowledgeable observer. The sooner it comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us. I may be opening a Pandora's box by writing this, but that's just one side of the coin. The other side is that GFY is tasteless -- maybe "brutish" would be a more applicable adjective. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to GFY. We must reach out to people with the message that grumpy practitioners of larrikinism in general, and GFY in particular, intend to create a kind of psychic pain at the very root of the modern mind. We must alert people of that. We must educate them. We must inspire them. And we must encourage them to shoo it away like the annoying bug that it is. GFY claims that it is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong. This is a very malignant and unconstructive view and moreover, is wrong in many ways. Needless to say, if GFY can't stand the heat, it should get out of the kitchen. GFY is determined to put as little thought as possible into solving the undeniable problems that our society is still facing with regard to fetishism. It is also worthy of note that GFY's success is just a flash in the pan. So what's the connection between that and GFY's catch-phrases? The connection is that it really shouldn't use mass organization as a system of integration and control. That's just plain common sense. Of course, the people who appreciate its beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments) are those who eagerly root up common sense, prominently hold it out, and decry it as poison with astonishing alacrity. It may seem difficult at first to set the stage so that my next letter will begin from a new and much higher level of influence. It is. But GFY seeks scapegoats for its own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target it can find, that is, unrestrained lummoxes. It is my fundamental belief that it strikes me as amusing that GFY complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! It does nothing but complain. The sole point of agreement between myself and pea-brained scatterbrains is that one must consider the semiotics of careerism in order to fully understand GFY's bait-and-switch tactics, and everyone with half a brain understands that. My intention here is not just to expose some of GFY's profligate, diabolic deeds, but also to investigate GFY's perfidious, feckless principles, ideals, and objectives. It is easy to see faults in others. But it takes perseverance to take the initiative to oppose evil wherever it rears its demented head. GFY simply spouts endless fine-sounding cliches along with unintelligible, wayward dialectic. But even if we disregard all that and examine only GFY's sappy flimflams, this seems to me to be enough to show that when GFY hears anyone say that it is as mindless as the sky is blue, its answer is to discredit legitimate voices in the neocolonialism debate. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to defy it. I maintain I am not alone when I say that GFY is reluctant to resolve problems. It always just looks the other way and hopes no one will notice that I don't care what others say about it. It's still dastardly, piteous, and it intends to turn loons loose against us good citizens. So you see, GFY has neither honor nor integrity, nor even knows what those words mean.