Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
you keep going to kiddie porn as a hot button as a smear campaign trying to argue fighting copyright infringement is some how the same thing
it not
fact every person you put on fighting copyright infringement is a person you prevent from finding and convicting kiddie porn distribution
if you really cared about kiddie porn you would give up the is copyright debate.
tell them to drop the government involvement and put those people on catching the kiddie porn producers.
btw pirate bay reports kiddie porn directly to the police.
|
Yes, I do, because it's the truth.
It's not the same things, but it's part of those websites who do not moderate their content. What's the point of reporting something, if they don't remove it? Obviously they give a shit about the toddlers abused and "pirated" on internet, just like they give a shit about the consent that were never given for copyrighted work. That's the kind of moral we face, that's the kind of moral Gain Dines think this industry represent, even if they are not part of this industry. And those who put their ads on those sites, should not be part of this industry. It gives all of us bad reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
bullshit she is advocating education so that people can make an "informed" decision when purchasing porn
she is not advocating a ban in any way shape or form. Ecomonic hardship is not censorship. People advocating a boycott is not censorship that an economic protest.
|
Let me quote her again:
Images have now become so extreme that acts that were almost non-existent a decade ago have become commonplace. From studying thousands of porn films and images Dines found that the most popular acts depicted in internet porn include vaginal, oral and anal penetration by three or more men at the same time; double anal; double vaginal; a female gagging from having a penis thrust into her throat; and ejaculation in a woman's face, eyes and mouth.
"To think that so many men hate women to the degree that they can get aroused by such vile images is quite profound," says Dines. "Pornography is the perfect propaganda piece for patriarchy. In nothing else is their hatred of us quite as clear."
To me that sounds like she hate some shapes and form and wants to get rid of it. Is it really her business what other adults want to see?
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
your tours show nudity too so that a strawman arguement and you know it.
like your attempts to tie kiddie porn to copyright infringement.
Fact fair uses like commentary and parody can and in many cases do use copyright material without the copyright holders permission (it would be pretty hard for micheal moore to make fun of george bush if he need his permssion to use his speaches)
the act was specifically designed to support that free speech.
the copyright holder authorizes all fair use when they claim their exclusive rights, they agree to honor those fair use exceptions which are not a violation of the exclusive rights granted under the act.
|
If I label my site and the copyright holder decides what to be shown, there are less children exposed to it and there are less content, versus an unlabeled and illegal site with full movies and site rips distributed to children. Your bullshit talk about Michael Moore, Bush, parodies etc. again show you do not know what you are talking about. That "free speech" was never given to you in the first place.