Quote:
Originally Posted by Hotrocket
while not exactly as you posed the question, this rather timely story posted on xbiz a cpl days ago deals with a very similar situation and may shed some light on the possible outcome.
http://www.xbiz.com/news/121550 |
Interesting case. Thanks, I had not seen that.
So the trademark seems to trump "ownership"
I didn't ask this question with a bunch of legal questions in mind but after reading some of these replies, the legal implications of "ownership" , "leasing" or some variation are staggering.