http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/m...JUIl9OhB6xTBVI
She was told "she must refrain from wearing certain items of clothing, in particular, turtleneck tops, pencil skirts, fitted business suits, or other properly tailored clothing," the suit says.
"In blatantly discriminatory fashion, plaintiff was advised that as a result of the shape of her figure, such clothes were purportedly 'too distracting' for her male colleagues and supervisors to bear."
The sexy single mom pointed out to her bosses "that other female colleagues wore similar professional attire," and that some dressed far more provocatively, the filing says.
But her supervisors shot back that those women didn't have to worry about turning them on "as their general unattractiveness rendered moot their sartorial choices, unlike plaintiff," the papers say.
Lorenzana was also told that "as a result of her tall stature, coupled with her curvaceous figure, she should not wear classic high-heeled business shoes, as this purportedly drew attention to her body in a manner that was upsetting to her easily distracted male managers."
This is all over the web today.
http://www.google.ca/search?q=woman+...E5PMNaXTgL YE
I don't know, she's hot alright but she looks pretty professional to me.
Attention whore or do you think her supervisors are just being idiots and she has a good case?
Personally, based on what I've read so far I'd say she is going to take them to the fucking cleaners.