Quote:
Originally Posted by Deej
by that you mean... "Amp, you made a point but I shall not back down and admit that your words are substantial."
conspiracy or not. his statement is very valid...
|
Actually, I'll thank you not to put words in my mouth. I'm quite capable of saying what I mean and I most certainly don't need any help from you. In this case I mean I simply don't agree.
If the buck for 9/11 ultimately stopped with Bush because it was his watch and he was in charge then the same argument can be applied to Obama. If offshore drilling was so dangerous, if regulation so poor, and Obama failed to act to change these things then how does the blame not fall at least partially on him? Especially given the context of this particular argument where people are blaming Bush, who is no longer in office and hasn't been for more than a year.
Context is everything, a subtlety perhaps that's lost on you. I think you've missed the entire point of my post and I'm not sure I can make it any easier for you.