View Single Post
Old 05-27-2010, 06:31 PM  
Jaytown
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShellyCrash View Post
And while I agree in part, I feel the need to point out the site we are talking about here is Kinkygfs.com:

http://kinkygfs.com/main.php

Now as someone who has purchased legal Ex-GF content, I see some content on this page that I know is legally shot.

Legally obtained may be another story- especially since their 2257 link now goes to a dead page (it didn't cross my mind to take a screen cap yesterday). Some of the producers of that content post here and me be able to verify if it was paid for, but that aside- for this url in particular- I don't see any red flags.

Remember, the gateway is just that. Netbilling isn't the merchant account. And this site reasonably appears to be legit.

Now let's take a look at another one:

http://www.myalternativegf.com/t1/index.php

Some of the chicks on this tour I know for a fact are underage. Juxtaposing 15 year old girls on a page that shows full penetration is just wrong.

I'd like to think that even to the untrained eye most can spot the difference, and as industry professionals I really hope everyone on this board sees it too.

We can police this by choosing who we do business with. I believe in Netbilling and I don't think they did anything wrong, so I will continue to support them, but I'll never work with the other guys because I've told them REPEATEDLY they've got kids on their site and they've done nothing about it. They hit me up once on ICQ around 5am EST and asked me which girls to remove and they never replied back.
You are exactly right, I have seen most all the girls on the tour in gf content packs for sale as well and I would be willing to bet that the people they bought it from COULD post here to verify it if they wanted to. They really are pointing the finger at the wrong site for sure cause if you look at the other site you listed then it becomes VERY obvious that there is a HUGE difference in content that is VERY questionable. Btw their 2257 page is fine for me.

Last edited by Jaytown; 05-27-2010 at 06:33 PM..
Jaytown is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote