Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
there are three different fair uses being discussed each has a different reason for you being wrong.
robbie claimed that a parody wasn't a parody becuase it wasn't created from scratch he was wrong because the courts ruled downfall parodies were parodies
you claimed it was only a parody because it was built on a sample but your wrong because
- Sampling is it own fair use indpendent of parody
- cover/parody songs take the entire copyright protected score and layer new lyric on top of them
you then shifted into timeshifting and argued it was only valid for the entire copy because it for personal use, but it not what the wiki or the court case said it said "private viewing" which the cablevision case clearly established was different (although closely related) to "personal use". |
I quoted the wiki as to the reason your example fell under fair use and why that is vastly different than Robbie's example.. whatever the various, the many reasons that make your example fair use, is why your example is not the same as what robbie gave.