Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
you took a portion for audio recording for personal use and applyed it to timeshifting
the court case never said that either
in fact the recent extension of timeshifting in a cloud proves the exact opposite
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/08/victory-dvrs-cloud
if timeshifting was only valid for personal use
then cable vision providing timeshifting thru the public cloud for a monthly pvr fee would have been illegal.
your pulling the personal use condition out of your ass
yeah i agree i am right and he is wrong huge difference
changing the subtitles of a clip to change the CONTEXT is fair use of parody
you don't have to create something from scratch to have the right to have your work called parody. |
None that has to do with what I said, at all. Again we're talking about fair use which has time shifting within it. I'm simply quoting what wiki says and you're twisting it to make a new argument for yourself. It's rather stupid.
The argument with Robbie wasn't about wrong or right.. however if you're trying to be correct, your example failed as it's not related to what Robbie was talking about.