Quote:
Originally Posted by holograph
this is your single one true statement, i cannot validate and you cannot validate, prove or disprove, so stop pushing some estimates as true stats of who paid for what and has legit right to timeshift on the interwebs. because those numbers someone's estimations and not factual data.
|
i am not agreeing with you i am pointing out how stupid you are
the research study used the counting principles/allocation principles used for the data used in the anti-piracy cases.
if the number and counts were invalid it would be impossible to convict a single person of piracy.
the court recognized the validity of the statiticaly anlysis when used as evidence to convict
it equally valid when i quote it.
btw
if the content is not available in a country then no sale is being lost
if no sale is being lost the economic damage is no greater then if the "piracy" never occured.
which means your trying to justify censorship using the economic monopoly of copyright.
Quote:
Originally Posted by holograph
my argument is simple. invent licence validation mechanism and timeshift all you want what you really paid for with others who really paid for it.
publicly available downloads only explode piracy and have nothing to do with fair use, until there are mechanism in place to validate your purchase of some content license. period.
|
and if that was the way it worked then the vcr would have been illegal you figuired out a perfect way to make sure you could daisy chain two of them together and copy movies (making bootlegs see above)
and the home viewing market which exceeds all other markets combined would never have existed.
thank god idiots like you are not responsible for defining what is fair use.