Quote:
Originally Posted by mayabong
For the most part, it NEVER involves debating the evidence, and usually just involves name calling or some medical psychological problem (as you listed).
|
Because what you and orther 911/truthers claim to be "evidence"...is not "evidence" but is most usually opinion or bits and pieces of this or that are combined together to give the appearence of being "evidence" when in fact it is just compiled pigshit.
When real "evidence" is presented to you and others as a counter claim against your claimed "evidence"...the usual response is to make claim that it/they are part of the "cover up/conspiracy"...or to simply ignore and deflect with some other piece of pigshit?