Quote:
Originally Posted by lazycash
For the most part I'm in support of the law and its intention and I want it to stay, just think it needs to be tweeked a bit. We can discuss it in detail after you've actually read it and its entirety. I'm banging my head because you express yourself in sweeping generalizations that simply are not true, including your thread title and this sentence, "Heard this morning on the news that people who have season tickets and regular attending supporters of the phoenix suns are not going to be attending any further games or activities put on by the suns."
The Suns are actually gaining far more support, not losing it by taking a stance. You seem to have a hard on against the Suns for taking a stance, yet what about the dozens of other private companies who have come forward against the law also. If an organization/company comes forward and takes a stance on a particular issue then according to you they are guilty of causing controversy.
|
I was simple mentioning what I hard on the morning news as I mentioned and it did not surprise me after the stunt they pulled.
I do not feel any company is guilty of voicing their opinion. It was the suns and the way they did it that that got under my skin.
Like I said before, I see nothing wrong with the new law, you obviously have another opinion and that's OK. If you would like to point out what you see so bad about this law, please feel free to express yourself.