Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
then you should haven enought to sue the model for breach of contract no need to bitch about on gfy
look fact that bradley committed to independent cost doesn't automatically obligate a model to show up to your casting
both producers incurred those cost and the model can't be in to places at the same time
the very nature of the modeling world has models attempting to go see multiple potential jobs. they might be rejected for one, they might be rejected from both and yes they might get both offers and be forced to choose the best one
unless the contract specifies the priority (first right or refusal etc) the way the current laws are written she has that right.
there are enough cases in mainstream acting and modeling to prove that point
btw in the real world entertainment world that the way it works
if you want priority you pay for it (option, first right or refusal etc)
|
The remedy for a contract dispute, is to enforce the contract or pay damages incurred as a result of the model failing to meet her obligations.
The price for attorneys fees and the time and money it would take to be right and win far exceeds what will be gained in return. Brians remedies are not feasible in this situation.
As Brian stated in this post he is ranting and sharing with other people what he and all of us producers deal with on the regular. And we all can identify and appreciate him sharing that with us.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
fact that bradley committed to independent cost doesn't automatically obligate a model to show up to your casting both producers incurred those cost
|
Yes it does!! "Detrimental reliance" Brian Relied on her promise to show up to set, to his detriment. This is demonstrated by him paying for all of the expenses so the shoot can happen prior to the girl "failing" or "flaking out".The facts are judged by the "reasonable person standard".Any "reasonable person" can see this in this fact pattern Brian presented.
You are incorrectly assuming that a "promise" that the model made to show up to Brians set is not "Consideration".
You are wrong. Your Google law has failed you. You need to know the rules, understand the fact pattern and need to know how to apply them to the specific facts at hand. You clearly dont know all of the rules of contracts and how they apply to this situation.
I R A C
I=Issue
R=Rule
A=analysis
C=Conclusion
Easy 1st semester stuff In Law School. With all of the Laws and rules you are constantly spouting off, you clearly demonstrate you dont have a legal mind and you dont know what the fuck you are talking about.
Knowing the Law=shit!
Knowing how that law applies to the situation at hand=Knowledge!
Now you have demonstrated that you know nothing about contact law, how it applies to a particular situation and you further demonstrated that you have no concept of porn production...
WHY ARE YOU HERE POSTING IN THIS THREAD??