Quote:
Originally Posted by borked
Suggesting someone's nick is a previously-known member I don't think calls for a false accusation, but for discussion. If you really want to take the rules to the letter, I think the title of his thread doesn't even literally say that Batts == BigDeanEvans, since there is no = sign.
|
1. Suggesting someone's nick is one of the most notorious scammers here is not an accusation?
2. "Batts New Nick - BigDeanEvans" - how can you possibly interpret that as anything other than him saying that BigDeanEvans is Batts? It's not "Is BigDeanEvans Batts?" Even though looping someone in with a scammer at all without posting SOME sort of reason why is still questionable, at least if he was ASKING if it could be true, THAT could be more of an opening it for discussion vs. an accusation. How many people will read the title of that thread, not look at the thread but then stay away from BigDeanEvans just because of that?
You don't get the severity of it because it's not you being accused of being Batts.