Originally Posted by theking

As I stated I am satisfied that if he had the building wired for demolition before hand that would be a prosecutable act and voided his insurance. Apparently the insuarance paid him off and he certainly has not been prosecuted...thus it is apparent that there is not any proof...only peoples opinions and BS. There are thousands of DA's in this country that would love to have proof of this. If he in fact had his building wired for demoliton it does not and would not negate the fact that the U.S. was attacked by a foreign entity and of that there is indisputable proof.