bump for exposure.
here's the link to comment.
Webmasters like to talk the "Talk"; but, do they walk the "Walk"?
This is your chance to put up or shut up.....Your name will be on the wall for all to see.
Take a minute out of you busy day and do the right thing.
Here it is.
This is from Joanne over at the FSC.
Your Public comment is critical in defeating .ICM’s .XXX sTLD!
Here’s what you can do to help:
1. Go to:
http://www.icann.org/en/public-comme...options-report
2. Click on “Add a comment” in the bottom left of the screen (this should take you to an email with the recipient filled in)
3. Write “I support option # 3” in the subject line
4. Cut and paste the text below into the body of the email
5. If you are comfortable, sign your name and company name for added emphasis.
6. Click “send” and pat yourself on the back for being part of a dynamic group working to defeat ICM’s .XXX sTLD
7. Send this information to other industry professionals-we need everyone’s help!
Email Text:
I am a member of the adult entertainment industry. I support Option # 3 of the March 26, 2010 process options submitted by ICANN for public comment.
I do not support the creation of a .XXX sTLD and believe that the ICANN Board was well within its rights to deny ICM’s application in the 2007 Board meeting in Lisbon.
Regardless of the option chosen, I ask that ICANN continue to consider the widespread opposition of the sponsored community in any further decisions concerning a .XXX sTLD.
If you wish to elaborate:
Feel free to elaborate, if you like. Please be reasonably courteous and businesslike, as this is an international policy forum.
Background:
On March 26th ICANN responded to the Independent Review Panel’s Declaration concerning the challenge filed by the ICM Registry over ICANN's denial of ICM's application for the .XXX sTLD.
ICANN’s Board of Directors considered the Panel's Declaration at the Board's meeting on March 12, 2010, and directed ICANN's CEO and General Counsel to finalize a report of possible process options for further consideration, and post that report for no less than 45 days of public comment.
After carefully reviewing the process options reported, FSC strongly supports Option #3 of the three options supporting the dissenting opinion which upholds the 2007 ICANN Board decision in Lisbon denying ICM’s application of a .XXX sTLD.
To view FSC’s comment to ICANN, visit
www.freespeechcoalition.com >
For questions or for more information contact Diane Duke at:
[email protected]
Redrob is offline Reply With Quote