Originally Posted by Quagmire

The problem is this:



And if you mix all three together you get...



There are so many variables involved from the twin tower location alone that every time I hear 'experts' start discussing all three buildings and bring up nano thermite, I have to shake my head. I have already mentioned to you the fact that the first tower going down registered on the richter scale 20+ miles away. Imagine the effect it had on the shared concrete basement complex and solid rock it was sitting on.

There is also a HUGE difference between 9/11 being an inside job and there being a cover-up after the fact by people who had their asses on the line for not doing their jobs properly in the first place and the whole situation being a complete clusterfuck.

I can site one specific example from personal experience which was flight 93 slamming in to the field in Pennsylvania. When it first happened, there were interviews with witnesses going live on the radio stating that they saw a military aircraft shoot it down. This was immediately after, not weeks or even days later. This version of the story quickly vanished in the media. But let me ask you this - how are the people on the flight better remembered and honored? As collateral damage, or as heroes who took action and sacrificed themselves as patriots for the greater good?

Where do I stand on 9/11? There is no doubt in my mind that there was a cover-up of facts after the events took place so average people would not realize how badly their government and defense systems failed them in an actual time of crisis.