Quote:
Originally Posted by DateDoc
You obviously do not understand the legal ramifications if they were to supervise, regulate and/or censor the uploaded content and then choose what content was shared.
|
Are you saying that they do not accept/view any of the content that is posted on the tube site? That it is all just random stuff posted by amateurs? The bottom line is that it is complete bullshit that someone needs to submit a DMCA take down notice at all. They just rename it something else. How can any producer hope to police the internet like that. They are supervising what is being posted-I do know that they state that they aren't regulating the content....I don't think that proving they do this is the only way to legally take an illegal tube site down. The entire concept of hosting a service that allows anyone to share stolen content is the same thing as napster. They are claiming that they are simply a gateway-that they have nothing to do with it. I have tested this out on a few tube sites-Give it a shot....just try to upload a video and see how quickly it is posted. If it was unregulated it would simply go up-it doesn't. I don't think they give a rats ass about legal ramifications at this point. The reason the adult industry is being treated like they don't matter is fear. I mean if this was music or mainstream hollywood movies there would be more legal teams fighting to protect it. I was looking around for attorneys that would handle something like this & I found that they are involved primarily in the recording, motion picture, television and video game industries. Why not adult?