View Single Post
Old 02-04-2010, 11:45 PM  
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,960
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRock View Post
I didn't see any response to this question. I am curious also ... Why aren't tube sites worried about 2257 ??? Just a short time ago, every adult webmaster was worried about complying with 2257 and bitching about it. Software was developed to catalog and organize 2257 documents and websites were developed to help producers be ready if the Feds came knocking. Now a few years later and the tubes are feeding all the content for free, no warning pages and no 2257 documentation ( same as the forums ). What changed? No one thinks the Feds will be investigating? Not enough convictions to scare anyone?
This has been covered a million times over the last couple of years but I'll give ya the short version:

User uploaded content is exempt from 2257

In my opinion 2257 is a stupidly written law to begin with that doesn't stop the perverts out there from shooting little children at all. But it sure does penalize honest people who aren't doing anything illegal. Sorta like most laws.

But to answer your question...there is a loophole that has constitutional questions regarding 2257 and user uploaded. So basically I can't put up a vid on my own site unless I have full documentation. But I can upload it to somebody else's site with none.

Yeah, it makes no sense. But that's the way it stands as of this moment.
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote